Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 2007 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $113.63 vs $270.26
- Up to 55% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-14700K - $0.47 vs $1.04 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 289 vs 270 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 28 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
270
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €126.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
45%
Price, €
€299.99
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |