Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 4388 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of FX-8120
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $70.29 vs $296.35
- Up to 66% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-14700K - $0.62 vs $1.83 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 42% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8120 - 162 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 28 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €70.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6728 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
34%
Price, €
€296.35
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €296.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6728 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8120 | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |