Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 4112 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of FX-8120
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - $63.32 vs $160.63
- Up to 53% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen 5 7600 - $0.34 vs $0.73 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 18% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than FX-8120 - 243 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €70.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
Buy for €178.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8120 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |