Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of FX-8120
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700X - $63.32 vs $240.20
- Up to 60% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 7700X - $0.78 vs $1.97 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 50% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8120 - 135 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €70.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.97/FPS
40%
Price, €
€266.62
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €266.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8120 | vs | Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |