Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3827 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of FX-8120
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - $63.32 vs $120.12
- Up to 29% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen 7 5700X - $0.12 vs $0.17 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 32% better in Minecraft than FX-8120 - 787 vs 596 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €70.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Buy for €133.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8120 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |