Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1765 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $89.44 vs $168.77
- Up to 46% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-10700F - $0.58 vs $1.08 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-6700 - 174 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
170
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1479 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
54%
Price, €
€187.34
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €187.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1479 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700 | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |