Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3113 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $86.76 vs $219.13
- Up to 52% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-14700F - $0.56 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 22% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6700 - 209 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 28 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €96.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
48%
Price, €
€243.23
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |