Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2744 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $99.28 vs $765.76
- Up to 82% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-13400F - $0.57 vs $3.23 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 37% better in War Thunder than Core i7-6700 - 237 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 16 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
173
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6836 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.23/FPS
18%
Price, €
€765.76
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6834 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |