Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $187.34 vs $446.27
- Up to 52% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.63 vs $1.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 13% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-10700F - 337 vs 299 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
299
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€187.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €187.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6540 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
337
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
48%
Price, €
€446.27
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €446.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6540 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |