Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3313 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Core i7-4820K
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $180.07 vs $341.19
- Up to 33% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.47 vs $0.70 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 130 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 29% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-4820K - 490 vs 380 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
380
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €180.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7154 minutes ago
Buy for €341.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7155 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4820K | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |