Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3698 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Core i7-4820K
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $162.23 vs $338.95
- Up to 44% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i9-14900KF - $1.17 vs $2.08 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Halo Infinite than Core i7-4820K - 181 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 32 vs 8 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
154
85%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €180.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
56%
Price, €
€376.23
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4820K | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |