In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4820K is much slower than the Core i9-14900KF and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $230 cheaper!
Core i7-4820K
- Up to 54% cheaper – $199.88 vs $429.99
- Up to 54% cheaper
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 119% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 119% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 2% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.16 vs $3.22/FPS
- Up to 2% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4820K vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
62 FPS
46%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
45%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.22/FPS
98%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
46%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
10 MB
28%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4820K Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
