Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2622 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Core i7-4820K
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $162.23 vs $279.19
- Up to 27% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.84 vs $1.15 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 26% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-4820K - 270 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
214
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €180.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Buy for €309.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4820K | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |