Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2986 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Core i7-4820K
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $162.23 vs $230.09
- Up to 23% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i9-12900K - $1.29 vs $1.67 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Metro Exodus than Core i7-4820K - 153 vs 140 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
140
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €180.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Buy for €255.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4820K | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |