The Core i5-11600 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-11600
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i5-11600 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i5-11600 vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
132
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-11600 vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600 vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600 vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-11600 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| $213.00 | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
