Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Core i3-3220T
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $48.21 vs $604.65
- Up to 89% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.32 vs $3.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 32% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3220T - 222 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.02/FPS
11%
Price, €
€671.16
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220T | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |