Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3349 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Core i3-3220T
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $48.21 vs $230.09
- Up to 52% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-12900K - $0.23 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 127% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-3220T - 535 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 24 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
236
44%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Buy for €255.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220T | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |