Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 4061 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Core i3-3220T
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - $53.51 vs $288.28
- Up to 74% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-14700KF - $0.55 vs $2.09 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 41% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3220T - 138 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 28 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
98
71%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7077 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.09/FPS
26%
Price, €
€288.28
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7077 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220T | vs | Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |