Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4061 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Core i3-3220T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $48.21 vs $351.41
- Up to 82% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i9-14900K - $0.59 vs $3.36 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 27% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i3-3220T - 116 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 32 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
91
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.36/FPS
18%
Price, €
€390.07
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220T | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |