Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Core i3-3220T
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $53.51 vs $279.28
- Up to 73% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-13700K - $0.35 vs $1.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 40% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3220T - 211 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 24 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
151
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7324 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
211
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
27%
Price, €
€279.28
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €279.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7324 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220T | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |