The Core i3-10325 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-10325
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4130
The Core i3-10325 is better in every way
Core i3-10325 vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10325
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Core i3-10325 vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10325 vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10325 vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10325
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10325 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| $154.00 | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
