Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3258 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $30.03 vs $140.41
- Up to 70% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-12600K - $0.19 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 43% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G1610 - 249 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
174
70%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
249
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
30%
Price, €
€155.85
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €155.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |