Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 3970 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - $30.03 vs $259.69
- Up to 87% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-14700KF - $0.22 vs $1.72 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1610 - 168 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 28 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
149
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.72/FPS
13%
Price, €
€288.26
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |