Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 3258 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-12700K - $30.03 vs $168.01
- Up to 79% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i7-12700K - $0.18 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 18% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron G1610 - 221 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 20 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
187
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
221
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
21%
Price, €
€186.49
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €186.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Core i7-12700K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |