In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G1610 is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-12700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Core i7-12700K
- Up to 90% faster in Battlefield 6 – 116 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 90% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 11 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 8 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Core i7-12700K: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
53%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
53%
Price, $
$48.51
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i7-12700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i7-12700K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-12700K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-12700K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
