Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2407 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $30.03 vs $104.94
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 3600% better in Cities: Skylines II than Celeron G1610 - 37 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 91% better value when playing Cities: Skylines II than Celeron G1610 - $3.15 vs $33.33 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €33.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€116.48
28%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €116.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |