Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 31% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G3930 - 298 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $57.14 vs $307.38
- Up to 75% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.28 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 51 vs 170 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
298
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
25%
Price, €
€341.19
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €341.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 337 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
227
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 336 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raphael | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
170 W | TDP | 51 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |