In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G3930 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 95% faster in Battlefield 6 – 119 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 95% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G3930 vs Core i9-12900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
61 FPS
51%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
52%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
![Intel Core i9 [12th Gen] i9-12900KF Hexadeca-core [16 Core] 3.20 GHz Processor - OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B09LMQ7XGX.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930 vs Core i9-12900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930 vs Core i9-12900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
2 MB
7%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900KF Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
