Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $57.14 vs $251.60
- Up to 71% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-13700K - $0.37 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3930 - 219 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
171
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 517 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
29%
Price, €
€279.28
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €279.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 517 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |