Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700KF is 1766 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-12700KF - $57.14 vs $148.52
- Up to 58% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-12700KF - $0.42 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-12700KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G3930 - 166 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 20 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
151
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
42%
Price, €
€164.86
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €164.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930 | vs | Core i7-12700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |