Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms EPYC 75F3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 234 days newer than EPYC 75F3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 75F3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than EPYC 75F3 - 185 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD EPYC 75F3 - 125 vs 280 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€130.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €130.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 75F3 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |