Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms EPYC 75F3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 660 days newer than EPYC 75F3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 75F3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 28% better in New World than EPYC 75F3 - 160 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD EPYC 75F3 - 120 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 75F3 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€666.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €666.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 75F3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |