Key Differences
In short — EPYC 75F3 outperforms Ryzen 9 5900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 75F3 is 130 days newer than Ryzen 9 5900X.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 75F3
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 5900X - 210 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD EPYC 75F3 - 105 vs 280 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
203
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€265.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €265.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 75F3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 12 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |