Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms EPYC 75F3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 561 days newer than EPYC 75F3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 75F3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Monster Hunter: World than EPYC 75F3 - 284 vs 262 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD EPYC 75F3 - 170 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 75F3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
284
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€350.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €350.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 75F3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 12 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 170 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.5x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |