The Radeon RX 6650 XT is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 260X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $225.11 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- Up to 56% cheaper – $180.17 vs $405.28
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 115 vs 176 Watts
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon R7 260X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€405.28
44%
Value, €/FPS
€3.78/FPS
97%
Buy on Amazon
€405.28
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,639.34
In Stock
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
46%
Min 1% FPS
21
35%
Price, €
€180.17
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.67/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon R7 260X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon R7 260X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon R7 260X in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
37%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
18%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
18%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $139.00 |
| Navi II | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 176 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
280.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
168.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 17.6 GPixel/s |
337.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 61.6 GTexel/s |
10.79 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.971 TFLOPS |
