The Radeon R7 260X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $137.56 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- Up to 38% cheaper – $221.90 vs $359.46
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 115 vs 215 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
45%
Min 1% FPS
21
34%
Price, €
€221.9
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.52/FPS
73%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Average FPS
108
100%
Min 1% FPS
61
100%
Price, €
€359.46
61%
Value, €/FPS
€3.32/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€359.46
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€692.68
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€710.70
In Stock
Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
23%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
16%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
22%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
113.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
283.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.062 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 9th, 2019 |
$139.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
115 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
17.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 113.3 GPixel/s |
61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 283.2 GTexel/s |
1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.062 TFLOPS |