The Radeon RX 6650 XT is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $1393.95 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 176 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 85% cheaper – $245.39 vs $1639.34
- A much better value for money for gaming
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
88%
Min 1% FPS
60
85%
Price, €
€1639.34
14%
Value, €/FPS
€15.32/FPS
13%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, €
€245.39
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.01/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€245.39
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€162.15
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€296.92
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€251.35
In Stock
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
55%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
63%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
63%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
63%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Navi II | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
176 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 280.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 168.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 337.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 10.79 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
