The Radeon RX 6650 XT is the comparison's loser – it's at least much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3090 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $9.30 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- Up to 1% cheaper – $1639.34 vs $1648.64
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 176 vs 350 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 8 GB
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs GeForce RTX 3090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
66%
Min 1% FPS
60
61%
Price, €
€1639.34
100%
Value, €/FPS
€15.32/FPS
66%
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
162
100%
Min 1% FPS
99
100%
Price, €
€1648.64
99%
Value, €/FPS
€10.17/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs GeForce RTX 3090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs GeForce RTX 3090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs GeForce RTX 3090 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
30%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
89%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
61%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
30%
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
936.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2020 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $1,499.00 |
Navi II | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
176 W | Power Consumption | 350 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
280.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
168.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 189.8 GPixel/s |
337.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 556 GTexel/s |
10.79 TFLOPS | FP32 | 35.58 TFLOPS |