The Radeon R7 260X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7500 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $164.59 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- Up to 43% cheaper – $221.90 vs $386.49
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 70 vs 115 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon PRO W7500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
58%
Min 1% FPS
21
47%
Price, €
€221.9
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.52/FPS
100%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, €
€386.49
57%
Value, €/FPS
€4.6/FPS
98%
Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon PRO W7500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon PRO W7500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon PRO W7500 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
60%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
16%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
32%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
16%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
$139.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 115 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 108.8 GPixel/s |
| 61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 190.4 GTexel/s |
| 1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS |
