The Radeon PRO W7500 is a slightly faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $60.16 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 70 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 16% cheaper – $314.61 vs $374.77
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Radeon PRO W7500 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, €
€374.77
83%
Value, €/FPS
€4.46/FPS
85%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
99%
Min 1% FPS
44
98%
Price, €
€314.61
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.79/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€314.61
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€315.31
In Stock
Radeon PRO W7500 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon PRO W7500 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon PRO W7500 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
60%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
78%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
89%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
45%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon PRO W7500 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
$429.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
70 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
172 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
108.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
190.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
12.19 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |