Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 1328 days newer than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 120 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Arc A750
- Performs up to 300% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 32 vs 8 FPS
- Up to 78% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - $9.73 vs $44.93 per FPS
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for €359.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
32
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€311.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €311.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
32%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Alchemist |
$279 | MSRP | $289 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |