The Radeon PRO W7500 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 290 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $117.12 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 70 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
- Up to 30% cheaper – $269.37 vs $386.49
Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon R9 290 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, €
€386.49
69%
Value, €/FPS
€4.6/FPS
90%
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Average FPS
65
77%
Min 1% FPS
32
71%
Price, €
€269.37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.14/FPS
100%
Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon R9 290 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon R9 290 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon R9 290 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
54%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
56%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
80%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
40%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon PRO W7500 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
| $429.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
70 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 172 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
108.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 60.61 GPixel/s |
190.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 151.5 GTexel/s |
12.19 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.849 TFLOPS |
