The Radeon R9 290 is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $7.23 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 3% cheaper – $262.14 vs $269.37
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 100 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
72
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, €
€262.14
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.64/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
60%
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
91%
Texture Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
91%
FP32
4.416 TFLOPS
91%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 290 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $159.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
275 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
60.61 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 55.2 GPixel/s |
151.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 138 GTexel/s |
4.849 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.416 TFLOPS |