The Radeon R9 290 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A770 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $270.26 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
- Up to 50% cheaper – $269.37 vs $539.63
Advantages of the Arc A770
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 225 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 290 vs Arc A770 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Average FPS
65
51%
Min 1% FPS
32
43%
Price, €
€269.37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.14/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€539.63
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€323.42
In Stock
Radeon R9 290 vs Arc A770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 290 vs Arc A770 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 290 vs Arc A770 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
20%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
25%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 290 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 60.61 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 307.2 GPixel/s |
| 151.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 614.4 GTexel/s |
| 4.849 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS |
