The Radeon R9 290 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $98.21 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
The GeForce RTX 3050 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 36% cheaper – $171.16 vs $269.37
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 130 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce RTX 3050 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€171.16
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.06/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€171.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€162.15
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€172.40
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€208.09
In Stock
Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce RTX 3050 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce RTX 3050 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce RTX 3050 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
53%
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
94%
Texture Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
94%
FP32
9.098 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 290 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
60.61 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 56.86 GPixel/s |
151.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 142.2 GTexel/s |
| 4.849 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.098 TFLOPS |
