The Radeon PRO W7500 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 270X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $135.14 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 70 vs 180 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Up to 35% cheaper – $251.35 vs $386.49
Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon R9 270X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, €
€386.49
65%
Value, €/FPS
€4.6/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
61%
Min 1% FPS
23
51%
Price, €
€251.35
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.92/FPS
93%
Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon R9 270X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon R9 270X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon PRO W7500 vs Radeon R9 270X in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
96%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
44%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
22%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon PRO W7500 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 270X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
$429.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
70 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
172 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
108.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 33.6 GPixel/s |
190.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 84 GTexel/s |
12.19 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.688 TFLOPS |