The Radeon R9 270X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $18.02 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Up to 7% cheaper – $251.35 vs $269.37
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 180 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
76%
Min 1% FPS
23
70%
Price, €
€251.35
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.92/FPS
82%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, €
€269.37
93%
Value, €/FPS
€4.02/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
47%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
52%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
52%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
52%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |