The Radeon R9 390 is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 480 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's the same price!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
The Radeon RX 480 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 480
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 150 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 480 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
99%
Min 1% FPS
33
97%
Price, €
€269.37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.02/FPS
99%
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Average FPS
68
100%
Min 1% FPS
34
100%
Price, €
€269.37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.96/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 480 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 480 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 480 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
88%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
88%
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
67%
Pixel Fillrate
40.51 GPixel/s
63%
Texture Fillrate
182.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.834 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2016 |
| $329.00 | MSRP | $229.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Arctic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 40.51 GPixel/s |
| 160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 182.3 GTexel/s |
| 5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.834 TFLOPS |
