The Radeon R9 390 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $24.55 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
The Arc A750 is better in every way
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 9% cheaper – $244.82 vs $269.37
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 225 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
55%
Min 1% FPS
33
46%
Price, €
€269.37
90%
Value, €/FPS
€4.02/FPS
50%
Buy on Amazon
€244.82
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€252.33
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€272.23
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€251.35
In Stock
Radeon R9 390 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
24%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
30%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
275 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |