The Radeon R9 270X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $35.14 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Consumes up to 20% less energy – 180 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 14% cheaper – $216.21 vs $251.35
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
49%
Min 1% FPS
23
40%
Price, €
€251.35
86%
Value, €/FPS
€4.92/FPS
42%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, €
€216.21
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.07/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€216.21
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€485.59
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€477.47
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€476.58
In Stock
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
28%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
28%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
28%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
