The Radeon Pro W5700 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 260X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $35.15 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- Up to 16% cheaper – $180.17 vs $215.32
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 115 vs 205 Watts
Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon R7 260X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, €
€215.32
83%
Value, €/FPS
€2.19/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
50%
Min 1% FPS
21
39%
Price, €
€180.17
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.67/FPS
60%
Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon R7 260X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon R7 260X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon R7 260X in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
23%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
15%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
23%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
23%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro W5700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | $139.00 |
| Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 205 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
120.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 17.6 GPixel/s |
270.7 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 61.6 GTexel/s |
8.663 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.971 TFLOPS |
