Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms the more expensive Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 is 3010 days newer than the more expensive Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 - 115 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 3050
- Performs up to 64% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon R7 260X - 54 vs 33 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Radeon R7 260X - $137.96 vs $162.32
- Up to 48% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon R7 260X - $2.84 vs $5.46 per FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 8 vs 2 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €180.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
54
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€153.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €153.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 260X | vs | GeForce RTX 3050 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
$139 | MSRP | $249 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1552 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1777 MHz |
1625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |